Computerized Radionics: Is Healing Digital?

Computer Radionics Consciousness Energy Healing History Radionics Spirituality2 Comments on Computerized Radionics: Is Healing Digital?

Computerized Radionics: Is Healing Digital?

In conversation about radionics recently, I was slightly surprised at how disorganised or limited people are. Many seem very left-brained, relying on computers for radionics diagnosis—a practice that carries its own risks.

A computer does all the diagnosis, via algorithms and linear data calculations. In essence, enough is programmed in there so that it takes on a form and pattern. But it is virtual reality! That’s make-believe; fantasy. And now we have a device that can link us into that fantasy world even more. Our keepers, for so they are, have found a way to control everyone, willingly. But it’s smoke and mirrors. It always wears out because it’s about change. This karmic world is about the passage of time which initiates change in our consciousness.

This reliance leads to repeating too many patterns with those devices. They really are mindless adding machines. This growing dependence on virtual reality and the metaverse is troubling. Led by the sacrosanct of Davos, they are actually building a thoughtform through agreement and participation, installing it into the physical interface. It’s an attempt at animating or controlling everything in everyone; it’s a modern-day Tower of Babel.

To understand why this happens, consider the NLP model, which is simple yet crucial to understanding perception. We delete, distort and generalise our experiences. That means that it is the left brain function, which is in charge of the external world, so we have developed concepts of time and other strategies that are on-going, or going on!

This relates directly to how digital computers work. Simply put, look at an image, then take the data packets which are sequences of digits and pixels. Massive amounts of these make up a screen, where digital packets are arranged and we can view it. The more data packets, the better the picture, when it comes to crispness and detail. This digital pattern is projected onto a screen and forms an image—a digital one. To make it, you need to delete data and then add to it, so as to basically recreate what you see, and don’t see. It’s a visual image, surface view only. It’s a distorted view because you have to delete certain parts to make it fit, and run it through a program. That’s like beliefs, of how the projection is going to be viewed; that is, beliefs distort, then you generalize about the image you see.

Because of this, we are so intertwined with computers that we have constructed a space called the ‘metaverse’. This is basically a field extension of analogue information from the right brain converted into a reflection of its former self. It’s the reflection that Narcissus is in love with. It’s in the realm of the sophisticated ego. Joining with computers and accessing the world with the resultant machinery—the attempt to view the real world through computers—is much like the thinker and what they dream of doing. More often than not they build Towers of Babel.

A computer radionics device is linear in nature. It projects what we want to see and attempts to reflect heaven. It matches and mirrors, it parrots behaviours for survival. The Left Brained world is one of facts and objects. It cannot understand spirituality on its own but must acknowledge and partner with the Right Brained reality or observer. The observer, it’s fair to say, acknowledges the ego’s role of being the thinker and the source of human intellect. Both must be consciously linked with one’s Higher Self, which exists in the dimension of Unity.

We come from Unity, into duality, then triplicity, and so on, ad infinitum. Paranoia is a major fear we have of losing our minds. There are so many splits; we literally live in a schizophrenic world, and the digital aspect divides it even further from our human experience. It’s mostly based on a mental construct of nature and elements. It is a world that mimics what we want to see. It’s for people who want healing ‘done to them’ with no changes or effort on their part.

In this context, Artificial Intelligence may be able to learn as we do now, but that makes us superior. A.I. can never be, never will be superior to humans. It’s a synthesised program.

Still, we move things through the universe, and through digital technology we can improve our ability to know things. It can benefit and it makes us clever and smart, but it cannot make us truly intelligent and spiritual. It can only parrot and appear sophisticated. A traditional radionics device is analogue. A computer is digital in operation. It runs a digital program—a reflection that we view and imagine in the way we want. Digitally, it only accommodates what it’s told to do in a linear way. The Right Brain is all inclusive and can hold any concept. Computers can be programmed to work with that, but it can only emulate. We are far more than our inventions and technology.

Reflecting on this, I’m rehashing some of Tansley’s old thinking patterns, and putting them into the process. So much about radionics is based on the ego in this world. I understand that it’s part of the attitude of tool making. We make tools differently these days, but there’s nothing like having an in-person experience.

It is important to reiterate that radionics is not device-based; it is a process employing devices. The ego believes or distorts it in all sorts of ways. Our language demonstrates it. We ascribe all sorts of human traits to our implements. That’s the ego in other words. Integration occurs when ego and Higher Self encounter one another. It’s a triangulation of the points of reference of the realms coordinated via our mind. We have both a Right Brain and a Left Brain. A conduit is created with both thinker and observer coming together with the Higher Self. For it to work, it must be matched on all three points, not just one, as in the case of the Tower of Babel.

Consider that a computer has no intuition, senses or feelings. It’s just pure data and analysis. It’s like astrology done by computers; it works but has no depth in its analysis of data. The data is digitised which means it’s edited, not organic—it’s just the surface, not the full picture, shadows on the wall of Plato’s Cave.

Archetypes unite us or act as a connection to all of us in what we do. The archetype here is Narcissus, gazing into the pool at his own reflection, having fallen in love with it to the exclusion of all else. There is a radionics archetype, and as practitioners, we build the thought form: toroidal in nature, spirals within spirals and wheels within wheels. It’s accessed through imagination and memory.

Our job as healers is to heal, to help others to be whole, holistic in nature.

Brain research has shown that the left and right hemispheres are joined by an estimated 2 million nerve fibres, the largest group of which is called the corpus callosum, and they provide the primary means of inter-hemispheric communication. The left hemisphere is mainly involved with logical and analytical thinking, particularly in respect of mathematical and verbal functions. According to Carl Sagan, the left hemisphere processes information sequentially, works in series, and is much like a digital computer. Orenstein, a leading researcher in the field, says that language and mathematics are both left hemisphere activities that depend predominantly on linear time.

It’s interesting that the Right Brain is analogue and is capable of holding several opposing opinions in balance. The ego can’t do that and has to be taught to shift its perception and what it connects to.

Remember the NLP model: delete, distort and generalise? That’s the Left Brain. That’s digital, of the ego. There are many split parts, and this is the digital computer model. So the Left Brain cannot entertain conflicting stories, whereas the Right Brain can. The Right Brain can entertain nuances.

When there is conflict, it’s always the Left Brain trying to work it out. It goes by rote and modelling and performing its own perceptions. It’s the world of facts and it’s all linear. That means it takes a long time to arrive at something. Hence our court systems, all government etc., are all linear and intellect based.

An integrated ego means taking on the Right Brain and Higher Self in a process. The story of the Holy Grail is the transformation of the ego into a cup that can hold the blood of Christ. This is a very high calling, but one which we can all aspire towards. It’s a right brained offering to the ego so it can commune.

Digital, on the other hand, is the deletion and we program it to distort and then generalise the experience.

I think we need to realise we can enhance and transform ourselves with radionics and expand the process. Process allows all aspects. So many would have us remain in Plato’s cave.

It’s true that the Left and Right Brain are not only analogue but can also work in a quantum way—intuition.

All healing is analogue and reflects the Right brain or Dimension I, from Tansley’s work. The computer is based on deletion. Computers are adding machines and their programs are repetitive. I don’t think computer radionics works at all. If it does, it would be a shadow.

Computer radionics stays in the physical. An exception would be the AetherOne platform, which seems promising. It works on the principle that consciousness draws order out from chaos.

Everything is sensation only. The body, dreams, everything. So we’re not seeing the real world, but only the senses. There is a lot we assume of what is real and what is not. Our thinking process works hard to maintain its moorings to the material universe. It involves effort, but we are so used to the hard work that we overlook it. We rarely relax the mind into a state of equilibrium.

Quantum relationship happens at the molecular levels, and is a zero point phenomenon. An ordinary digital computer can’t do it. A Quantum computer can, or rather, it should be said, “could” do it. A quantum computer is not digitised like our computer systems are, creating a false sense of reality. Digital computers create an alternate reality that tricks the mind.

In a world increasingly dominated by digital illusions and virtual constructs, true healing beckons us back to the consciousness of life—the subtle interplay of energy and intention that no algorithm can replicate. Radionics is the invitation to deepen our connection with the unseen, to harmonize the fractured self, and to embrace the wholeness that arises when ego, observer, and Higher Self converge. Let us remember that technology is a tool, and that transformation flows from the timeless, living processes that unfold both within and around us.

You’re welcome to join the conversation by leaving a comment below.

This article was inspired by conversations with John Nauss.

Sharing is caring!

2 thoughts on “Computerized Radionics: Is Healing Digital?

  1. I had a hard time digesting your article mainly because the only platform I use is AetherOne. the fact that it’s principle is based on TRNG which seems to be a valid bridge between digital world and the mind makes me consider it a professional Radionic software comparing to others which just show you knobs and allow to upload picture. Then show you some ezoteric stuff and that’s it. I think I do catch the point of this article and I agree to certain degree, but don’t we always say that the operator is the most important? So why does it matter if it’s paper, box, electricity or digital it’s just the carrier of the intention. I think it all boils down to the procentage of involvement of the operator. If one wants full automation and just one button and no commitment well the results will be always poor no matter which platform you choose.

    1. Hi Inth, I did mention that AetherOne feels like legitimate radionic software because of its use of the True Random Number Generator and thus its principle of bringing order from chaos. I’ve written about this previously in another article or two some years back.
      Meanwhile most, if not all, other software, when starting from principle of the computer, is digitized and linear, it is not organic. It’s viewed from the point of where you start, from either a “pro-computer” or “anti-computer” stance, as to whether it is easy to understand. Just try to imagine and feel into what a computer does compared with what what the operator’s intentions are. The principles are as different as chalk and cheese, so to speak. It would take another article to attempt to address the issues you raised, so I’ll let this article stand for what it is.
      Overall the points discussed in each article on this website should be taken together, as a whole. Take it as a kind of fluid philosophy, even as it evolves gradually over time. But by the same token, it is intended that each article may be read on its own.
      Thanks for your interest. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top